View Single Post
Reply
  #5  
Old 19th December 2007, 00:18
mog mog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 23rd August 2004
Location: UK near London
Posts: 186
Blog Entries: 18
Default Re: Imaginary Prostate Massage

Hi, Canuck!

>Speaking of the Aneros, but has anyone tried the different moduls? Mog, I seem to mention you having one.<

I can’t be of much help to you because since having had such great success with the KSMO I don’t use the Aneros very much any more; only sometimes when I feel like having a change of scene and when I have two or three hours available for a long session. Consequently my Aneros practice is a bit neglected and insufficiently current for me to feel comfortable in offering advice on the different models.

I have all the models going back to the SGX, except the Progasm . To be frank I’ve not found a great deal of difference in use between the various shapes that I possess except between the thinnest, the Eupho, and the thickest, the Maximus. It seems to me that once having become sensitised, comfortable, and reasonably proficient with the practice it hardly matters what the precise shape is – you can have fun with any of them!

But the most marked difference in feel has got to be between the Euphos which is a very mobile device, and due to its slimness offers a nice tight clenching grip, and the Maximus which fills nicely but with less agility. The comparison is rather like between a sports car and a bus (they both have their uses!)

If I’m having an Aneros session I usually start with the Euphos and work through the range, ending up with the Maximus. But I can’t say that any one stands out for giving more fun than any other. They are all just different in feel.

In looking at the Progasm and Eupho you are looking at extremes.

I think that choosing a single model from the Aneros range is neccesarily going to be a bit of a gamble.

I’m sorry that I can’t offer any really useful help in your choice. But if you have any further questions please fire away!
Reply With Quote